本文へジャンプ

【マンモスの骨で作った家、人類寒冷地住宅の祖型】




 人類史という巨視的な歴史には圧倒的な、有無を言わせぬ迫力を感じさせられる。
 現代世界にまで繋がってくる「魂のルーツ」みたいなものが深く襲ってくる。わたしもしばらくぶりにこの国立科学博物館を訪れたので、たぶん展示が相当にリニューアルしているのか、わたしの不注意での見落としか、思わず目を見開かされていたのがこの「マンモスの骨製の家」。
解説は以下のようだった。
 〜マンモスの骨を利用した住居
 機能的な住居の建設技術は、寒冷地へ本格的に進出するための必要条件だった。とくに草原の広がる東ヨーロッパ地域では寒い冬に避難できる洞窟や岩陰が少ないのでなおさらである。ウクライナを中心に、マンモスの骨を利用した3万~1万年前の住居跡が数多く見つかっている。なかでも圧巻なのはメジリチ遺跡第1号住居(1万8000年前)で、95個の下顎(かがく)骨をはじめ400にものぼる骨が使用されていた。この展示では、メジリチ遺跡の例をモデルに、当時の住居を部分的に復元した。〜
 人類のグレートジャーニーでシベリアの地は難関として立ちはだかり、陸続きのベーリング海峡を抜け、アメリカ大陸に到達するまで人類は寒冷気候に進路を阻まれていたとされる。当然、その寒冷地で「どう生存していくか」知恵が絞られた。食糧はマンモスなどの大型動物をハンティングすることで満たされていただろう。逆に言うと、人類のグレートジャーニーの「動機」は、そうした大型動物獲得が最大の「導き」だったのだろう。
 一方で人類が「魚類」を食用源として最適化させたのは、日本列島到達グループだったと思える。現代にまでつながる食習慣として、ユニークな人類史なのかも知れない。
 で、北方に向かえば当然、日々の暮らしの拠点である「住宅」は重武装化、寒さへの対応を必然化させる。いや、そもそも住宅の構造材として「木材」が獲得できなかった。そういう現実に直面した人類が、マンモスの食用後の巨大な骨に着目したのは、ごく自然だろうとは思う。
 また、一方で「断熱」という機能について、その外皮の毛皮が着目されるのもこれまた自然。
 しかし、複雑な形状の骨をどう「組み合わせるか」、最初期にこうした住宅を考えた祖先は、知能をフルに活性化させたに違いない。「えっと、あの骨は継ぎ合わせ部分がこうなっているから・・・」と複雑な3次元形状と格闘しながら、創造に向かったことだろう。 性能とデザイン・・・。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Houses Made from Mammoth Bones: The Prototype of Human Housing in Cold Climates]
The question of “How to survive in a cold climate?” presented humanity with a monumental challenge for survival. Structure and insulation. Our ancestors brought a brilliant “solution” to life. …

 The grand scale of human history evokes an overwhelming, undeniable sense of awe.
 A profound sense of the “roots of the soul”—something that extends all the way to the modern world—came over me. It had been a while since I’d visited the National Museum of Nature and Science, so perhaps the exhibits had been significantly revamped, or maybe I simply overlooked it due to my own inattention, but what really caught my eye was this “house made of mammoth bones.”
The explanation read as follows:
 ~A dwelling constructed from mammoth bones
 The technology for building functional dwellings was a prerequisite for full-scale settlement in cold regions. This was especially true in Eastern Europe, with its vast grasslands, where caves and rock shelters offering refuge from the cold winters were scarce. Centered in Ukraine, numerous remains of dwellings built using mammoth bones dating from 30,000 to 10,000 years ago have been discovered. Among them, the most impressive is Dwelling No. 1 at the Mezhyrich site (8,000 years ago), which utilized as many as 400 bones, including 95 lower jawbones. This exhibit partially reconstructs a dwelling from that period, modeled after the example from the Mezhyrich site.~
 During humanity’s Great Journey, Siberia stood as a formidable obstacle; it is believed that until humans crossed the Bering Strait—which was then a land bridge—to reach the Americas, their path was blocked by the frigid climate. Naturally, they had to rack their brains to figure out “how to survive” in that cold environment. Food needs were likely met by hunting large animals such as mammoths. Conversely, one might say that the “motivation” behind humanity’s Great Journey was largely driven by the pursuit of such large animals.
On the other hand, it appears that it was the group that reached the Japanese archipelago that optimized “fish” as a food source. This may represent a unique chapter in human history, as it has led to dietary habits that continue to this day.
 So, as they headed north, it was only natural that their “dwellings”—the centers of their daily lives—would become heavily fortified, making it essential to adapt to the cold. In fact, they couldn’t even obtain “wood” as a structural material for their dwellings in the first place. Faced with this reality, it seems perfectly natural that early humans would turn their attention to the massive bones left over after eating mammoths.
 Furthermore, regarding the function of “insulation,” it’s also natural that they would focus on the fur covering the mammoths’ bodies.
 However, when it came to figuring out how to “assemble” bones with complex shapes, our ancestors who first conceived of such dwellings must have fully engaged their intellect. “Hmm, since that bone has this kind of joint…”—they likely embarked on a creative process while grappling with complex three-dimensional shapes. Performance and design…

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.
 

【人類の知的好奇心の原点・根源ってなんだろう?】



 ネアンデルタール人と現生人類の交雑・共生が2万年間続いた遺跡に心が鷲づかみされてしまったまま、時間が停止しているようです(笑)。そもそもウチャーズリⅡ洞窟のサピエンスはどこから来たのか?
 約10万年前のサピエンスの化石が地図位置のレバントから発見されるがその後化石記録が途絶え、出アフリカまでの間この地から現生人類・サピエンスは撤退したと考えられている。
 いまわたしは歴史好きらしく、家系史探索も掘り起こし作業を並行して継続していますが、それも高々400年ほどの人間記録。2万年間の悠久な時間を共存していた時間感覚からすれば「つい最近のこと」。こういった遺跡研究はさまざまにわたしたちの想像力を無限解放してくれます。
 わたしは想像力が常に「前屈み」になり易いタイプ(笑)。そもそも科学博物館の展示案内もほんのちょっと情報断片が引っかかってきただけで、また展示物もポスターパネル6枚ほど。ほかにはウチャーズリⅡ洞窟現地でのドローン撮影とおぼしき映像がモニターに流されていただけ。
 最先端的な発見は情報解析の時間がまだ十分に掛けられないのだろうと思います。たぶん科学博の研究陣もどのように分析すべきか、活発に議論している段階なのでしょう。そういう「現段階でわかっていること」という条件づきの公開内容。
 しかし一方で情報公開されることで、さまざまな意見が世間的に盛り上がって、分析が全社会的な関心を高めていくものでしょう。それがまた科学者の分析を再加速させる。自由な「情報摂取者」としては、家系史研究と同様にその時代・時間での「人間がいだく心象・動機」を探ることになる。
 科学博側の現段階の見解は以下。
 〜見えてきた交流の中身 
■ウチャーズリⅡ洞窟でネアンデルタール人と現生人類は、2万年以上にわたり交流し均一な文化を維持していた。・同じ方法で石器を作り同じものを食べ、同じ貝殻を集めていた。
■種の垣根を超えて共通した文化を持ち得たのは交流があったからで「役に立たないが美しいもの」にまで至る共通の価値観があったのではないか。・共通の価値観が、両種の間に起きた交雑の基盤になった 〜
 アフリカタモトの貝ガラに「穴開け加工」が施されていたから、漁撈採集に向かう男性が、女性に美を飾る装身具としてプレゼント利用したのでは? と、わたしとしては直感した次第。
 もちろん証拠はない。しかし、人はどうしてもそういう情景を想像したくなる。さて・・・。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[What Is the Origin and Source of Humanity’s Intellectual Curiosity?]
Naturally, it must be “the desire to live a better life.” This cry of life must always have echoed at the very root of human evolution—for Neanderthals, for modern humans, and for me as well. …

 My heart has been completely captivated by this archaeological site where Neanderthals and modern humans interbred and coexisted for 20,000 years—it feels as if time has stood still here (lol). But where did the Homo sapiens at Uchazli II Cave come from in the first place?
Fossils of Homo sapiens dating back about 100,000 years have been discovered in the Levant, as shown on the map, but the fossil record then goes cold. It is believed that modern humans—Homo sapiens—withdrew from this region until they migrated out of Africa.
 It seems I’ve become quite the history buff lately, and I’m continuing to dig into my family history in parallel—though that, too, covers only about 400 years of human history. Compared to the sense of time spent coexisting over 20,000 years, that’s “just the other day.” Research into sites like this unleashes our imagination in countless ways.
 I’m the type whose imagination tends to get carried away (lol). To begin with, the exhibition guide at the Science Museum offered only a few scattered fragments of information, and the exhibits themselves consisted of just about six poster panels. Aside from that, there was only footage—presumably drone footage taken at the Ucharsli II Cave site—playing on a monitor.
 I suspect that not enough time has yet been devoted to analyzing the data from these cutting-edge discoveries. The research team at the Science Museum is probably still in the midst of lively discussions about how best to analyze the findings. The information released is therefore conditional—limited to “what is known at this stage.”
 However, the very act of making this information public is likely to spark a lively public debate, raising society-wide interest in the analysis. This, in turn, will further accelerate the scientists’ analysis. As a free “consumer of information,” I find myself, much like in genealogical research, exploring the “mental images and motivations” of people from that era and time.
 The Science Museum’s current view is as follows.
 ~The Nature of the Interaction That Has Come to Light~
■ At Uchazuri II Cave, Neanderthals and modern humans interacted for over 20,000 years and maintained a uniform culture. ・They crafted stone tools using the same methods, ate the same foods, and collected the same seashells.
■ The fact that they were able to share a common culture across species boundaries was due to this interaction; perhaps they shared common values that extended even to “things that are beautiful but not useful.” ・These shared values formed the foundation for interbreeding that occurred between the two species. ~
 Since the shells of the African river mussel had been “pierced,” my intuition tells me that men heading out to fish and gather might have given them to women as decorative ornaments.
 Of course, there is no evidence. However, one can’t help but imagine such a scene. Well then…

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

 

【2万年間の「異人類種」の文化共生の深層】



昨日に引き続き,東京国立科学博物館展示での「ネアンデルタール人と現生人類は価値観を共有していた」展示について。
 昨日食用には適さないアフリカタモトという貝ガラについて、発見者の方の肉声報告を書きましたが、どうも伝わらなかったようです。食糧の確保がきわめてキビシイ環境下で生存のために必死に海辺で暮らしている中で、食べられない貝殻を、ネアンデルタール人も現生人類も、共通してそれを採集していたことに、発見者たちは深く「えぐられていた」のですね。
 生存のために必死な貝の採集時に、あえて非食用の貝類を収集していたのには「装身具」として使っていただろうことがあきらか、なのですね。このことを発掘現地で体験した人には、人間という種の根がらみのいのちの叫び声が聞こえたのでしょう。すなわち、美へのこころのときめき。それが、食べるという基本命題と、まったく同位の価値観を持っていることの発見・・・。
 「芸術や好奇心が人類普遍の根源的な欲求である」ことを直視させられた実体験報告。
 〜■ウチャーズリⅡ洞窟に住んだネアンデルタール人とサピエンスは、2万年以上にわたり交流し、均一な文化を維持していた。
・同じ方法で石器を作り、同じものを食べ、同じ貝殻を集めていた。
 ■種の垣根を超えて共通した文化を持ち得たのは、交流があったからで、その基盤には、「役に立たないが美しいもの」にまで至る共通の価値観があったのではないだろうか。
・共通の価値観が、両種の間に起きた交雑の基盤になったのでは?〜〜
 このような交雑の結果、わたしたちのDNAには、ネアンデルタール人の痕跡も残されている。その具体的な「発掘の状況」までが、克明に展示公開されていた次第。2枚目の写真が、トルコ共和国南部に位置するウチャーズリⅡ洞窟の外観。一方、上の写真は、クロマニヨンの人びとの「心象世界」を伝えてくれる洞窟内絵画。
 人類の「こころの歴史」というものへの視点に鮮明な返答が示された気がしてならなかった。「アフリカタモト」への心象反応と同質のものが、絵画というカタチになって遠雷してくる。そしてその心象のDNAは、わたしたち現代人にも深層に宿っているのでしょう。
 こういう「科学」理解が学ばせられた次第。高齢期になって知る人類の深層部分。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[The Depths of Cultural Coexistence Among “Different Human Species” Over 20,000 Years]
An experience that concretely revealed the “depths of the history of the human heart.” We confront “physical evidence” that shows a penchant for beauty, art, and curiosity are fundamental, universal human desires. …

Continuing from yesterday, I’d like to discuss the exhibit titled “Neanderthals and Modern Humans Shared Values” at the National Museum of Nature and Science in Tokyo.
Yesterday, I wrote about the shell of the African clam, which is unsuitable for human consumption, based on a firsthand account from the person who discovered it, but it seems my point didn’t quite get across. Living on the seashore, desperately struggling to survive in an environment where securing food was extremely difficult, the fact that both Neanderthals and modern humans were collecting these inedible shells deeply “struck a chord” with the discoverers.
 It is clear that the reason they deliberately collected these inedible shells while desperately gathering shellfish for survival was to use them as “ornaments.” Those who experienced this firsthand at the excavation site must have heard the primal cry of life inherent to the human species. In other words, the heart’s thrill at beauty. The discovery that this holds a value entirely on par with the fundamental necessity of eating…
 A firsthand account that forced us to confront the fact that “art and curiosity are universal, fundamental human desires.”
 ~■ The Neanderthals and Sapiens who lived in the Uchazuri II Cave interacted for over 20,000 years and maintained a uniform culture.
・They crafted stone tools in the same way, ate the same foods, and collected the same seashells.
 ■ The fact that they were able to share a common culture across species boundaries was due to their interaction; might the foundation of that have been a shared set of values that extended even to “things that are beautiful but not useful”?
・Could these shared values have served as the foundation for the interbreeding that occurred between the two species? ~~
 As a result of this interbreeding, traces of Neanderthals remain in our DNA. The exhibition even provided a detailed account of the specific “excavation findings.” The second photo shows the exterior of the Uçahirli II Cave, located in southern Turkey. Meanwhile, the photo above depicts cave paintings that convey the “inner world” of the Cro-Magnon people.
 I couldn’t help but feel that this provided a vivid response to the perspective on humanity’s “history of the heart.” A mental response similar to that evoked by “Afrikamotomo” reverberates like a distant thunderclap, taking the form of these paintings. And surely, the DNA of that mental imagery still resides deep within us modern people as well.
 This is the kind of “scientific” understanding I was taught. It is a deep aspect of humanity that I have come to know in my later years.

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

 

【科学博「ネアンデルタールと現生人類の共生記録」学習】



 今回の東京行きで主目的は別にすれば、強く惹かれていたのは国立科学博物館の展示。「ネアンデルタール人と現生人類は価値観を共有していた」を学習すること。
 歴史学習はわたしの数寄の基本。って言うか、人間の生きてきたことに興味を持たない人間などはいないと思いますね。それぞれが「学び続けて」いるのだと思います。で、今回訪問先を整理していて東京上野で「新情報」を確認したいと強く希望していた。断片的には各種メディア情報で「トルコ南部・ウチャーズリⅡ洞窟で、ネアンデルタール人と現生人類(サピエンス)が数万年間、共住していた」という新発見を日本の科学博メンバーが行った事実は報道されていた。
 報道もされていたので科学博では大々的に展示されていると思いきや、実際の展示スペースと情報量は、パネル展示で6枚ほど。しかし、その情報のバックグラウンドとして「人類のはるかな全地球上拡散の旅路」の科学博が取り組んできた記録展示があるので、深みは圧倒的でありました。
 こういう科学博物館なので国民の「知る権利」を最大限尊重しすべて公開が原則とされていて、わたしのような一般人でも、撮影記録はまったくフリー。
 可能な限り科学博の最新知見を採集させていただけた次第。現代に生きているシアワセ。
 〜本研究は、トルコ、フランス、日本(京都大学、当館、福岡大学)による国際共同研究。本成果は2026年7月7日(日本時間)に米国の科学誌「米国科学アカデミー紀要)」に掲載されました。〜 という公開情報。
 2枚目の写真はこの研究の京都大学担当者・森本直記氏がとくに言及されていた非食用の貝「アフリカタモト」の標本展示。「ネアンデルタール人も現生人類も同じょうに収集して洞窟に持ち帰り、ネアンデルタール人により装飾品に加工されていた貝の現生同種の標本。従来、この貝の利用はサピエンスに限られると考えられてきた」との解説本文。
 そしてさらに肉感的に「刺さってきた」のは次の感想。「数万年前の洞窟時代、食糧入手は切実で文字通り死活問題だったはず。その環境でも食べられもしない貝殻に価値を感じていたことは、ヒトという生物にとって芸術や好奇心が根源的な欲求であることを意味していると私は考えています。」
 ・・・この深遠さに、目がクラクラしてしまった次第です。う〜む。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Learning from the Science Exhibition “Records of Coexistence Between Neanderthals and Modern Humans”]
The latest findings on human history, published on July 7, 2026, in the U.S. scientific journal *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*. Hearing the discoverer’s own words left me feeling dizzy. …

 Aside from the main purpose of this trip to Tokyo, what really drew me in was an exhibition at the National Museum of Nature and Science: learning about the idea that “Neanderthals and modern humans shared common values.”
 Studying history is fundamental to my passion. Or rather, I don’t think there’s a single person who isn’t interested in how humans have lived throughout history. I believe we’re all “continuing to learn.” So, while organizing my itinerary for this trip, I had a strong desire to verify some “new information” in Ueno, Tokyo. I had seen fragmented reports in various media outlets about a new discovery made by members of the National Museum of Nature and Science: “Neanderthals and modern humans (Homo sapiens) coexisted for tens of thousands of years in the Uçahirli II Cave in southern Turkey.”
 Since it had been reported in the news, I expected it to be featured prominently at the museum, but the actual exhibition space and amount of information consisted of only about six display panels. However, because the Science Museum has long been dedicated to documenting “Humanity’s Long Journey of Global Dispersal” as the backdrop to this information, the depth of the exhibition was truly overwhelming.
 As this is the kind of science museum that upholds the principle of maximum transparency and full disclosure to respect the public’s “right to know,” even ordinary people like me are completely free to take photographs.
 I was able to gather as much of the Science Museum’s latest findings as possible. What a blessing it is to be alive in this day and age.
 ~This research is an international collaborative study involving Turkey, France, and Japan (Kyoto University, this museum, and Fukuoka University). These findings were published on July 7, 2026 (Japan Standard Time) in the U.S. scientific journal *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*.~ — according to the publicly available information.
 The second photo shows a specimen of the non-edible shellfish “Africatamoto,” which Naoki Morimoto, the Kyoto University researcher in charge of this study, specifically mentioned. The accompanying text explains: “This is a modern specimen of the same species of shellfish that both Neanderthals and modern humans collected and brought back to their caves, and which Neanderthals processed into ornaments. Previously, it was thought that the use of this shellfish was limited to Homo sapiens.”
 What really “struck a chord” with me, however, was the following reflection: “During the cave era tens of thousands of years ago, securing food must have been a desperate, literally life-or-death struggle. The fact that even in that environment, people found value in shells they couldn’t even eat suggests to me that art and curiosity are fundamental desires for the human species.”
…I must admit, the profundity of this left me feeling a bit dizzy. Hmm.

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

【東京国立博物館でも館内ショップはほぼ外人さん(笑)】


 さて、昨日は今回の東京移動での主な会合参加が無事終了。
 あらゆる事象についての活発な意見交換会で、アタマのなかもスッキリさせることができました。やはりまだまだ老け込むことは許されない(笑)。
 で、会合参加までの時間で上野の東京国立博物館参観。平成館での「空海展」がメインで参観していましたが、さすがの国立施設なので、その「深み」は圧倒的な迫り方。わたしは迷える真言宗徒なワケですが、あの平安期の時代相の中で、真言密教の果たした日本文化への影響力の巨大さを再認識させられました。
 通常のトーハク参観よりも巨大なインパクトでした。で、こちらの方は仏教寺院関係者、いわばプロのみなさんもたいへん多数参観されていたようでした。わたしとしては、最近取り組んでこさせられている(笑)手書き筆文字・一部くずし字の大量古文書群への「見方」が、それこそ「見よう見まね」で活用出来てきているなぁと意を強くさせられた次第。・・・まぁ「なんちゃって」であることは自明ですが、それでも書き手の古人と少しくは「対話」できるような気がしてきていた。自分的には「長足の進化」ぶりで、これはいよいよ、取り組みを深めたいと思わされました。新体験。
 ・・・というような参観でしたが、この空海展会場ではさすがに西洋系の外人さんチラホラ程度だったのが、その会場を出てトーハクの館内に出ると、ほぼ外人しか目に入らない状況。昨日ブログで書いた状況が、こうした施設ではさらに顕著に表れている。きのう記載の渋谷・東横線どころではなく、外国語が飛び交って海外からの来館者が非常に多い印象を受けた。
 写真はショップの店内状況ですが、ほぼ8割くらいの印象比率。
 昨日のブログを書いた後、仏教伝来期前後での大陸半島からの大量の「帰化」状況について調べてみたいと思って「帰化人と在地の人との間で、トラブルや逆に融和の様子を伝える伝承などはないだろうか?」とAIと対話してみたら以下のような返答があったので、その一部転記。
 〜京都の太秦における帰化人(秦氏)と在地人との関係についてトラブルと融和の双方を伝える伝承や記録が古典や神社の縁起に残されています。後から来た技術集団である秦氏が、もともとそこにいた人々とどう関わったのか、具体的なエピソードを。・・・〜
 この内容についても今後探究してみたいのですが、また別の稿で。
 本日大雨との札幌に帰還予定。無事に着陸できるのかなぁ・・・。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Even at the Tokyo National Museum, the shop is almost entirely filled with foreigners (lol)]
I’m happy to see foreigners who want to “get to know Japan deeply”—welcome. Japanese history is also a flexible cultural history marked by the acceptance of “naturalized citizens.” …

 Well, yesterday I successfully wrapped up the main meetings I attended during this trip to Tokyo.
It was a lively exchange of views on all sorts of topics, and it really helped clear my head. As expected, I still can’t afford to get old just yet (laughs).
 So, before the meetings started, I visited the Tokyo National Museum in Ueno. My main focus was the “Kukai Exhibition” in the Heisei Hall, and as you’d expect from a national institution, its “depth” was truly overwhelming. I’m a somewhat lost Shingon Buddhist myself, but seeing the Heian-period setting really made me realize once again just how immense the influence of Shingon Esoteric Buddhism was on Japanese culture.
 It had a far greater impact on me than a typical visit to the Tokyo National Museum. It also seemed that a large number of people associated with Buddhist temples—in other words, the “pros”—were visiting as well. For my part, I felt my confidence grow as I realized that the “perspective” I’ve been developing—through my recent efforts (laughs)—on a massive collection of ancient documents written in hand-drawn brush script, some in cursive, is starting to pay off, even if it’s just a matter of “learning by imitation.” …Well, it goes without saying that I’m still just “faking it,” but even so, I’ve started to feel as though I can have a bit of a “dialogue” with the ancient scribes. For me, this feels like a “giant leap forward,” and it has made me want to delve even deeper into this work. A new experience.
 …That was my visit in a nutshell. While there were only a few Western visitors scattered about at the Kukai exhibition hall, once I left that hall and entered the rest of the Tokyo National Museum, almost everyone I saw was a foreigner. The situation I wrote about in yesterday’s blog is even more pronounced at facilities like this. It was nothing like the Shibuya and Toyoko Line areas I mentioned yesterday; foreign languages were flying around, and I got the impression there were a huge number of visitors from overseas.
 The photo shows the scene inside the gift shop, where foreigners made up about 80 percent of the crowd.
After writing yesterday’s blog post, I wanted to look into the mass “naturalization” of people from the Asian continent and the Korean Peninsula around the time Buddhism was introduced to Japan. I asked my AI, “Are there any legends or records describing conflicts or, conversely, harmony between naturalized immigrants and the local population?” and received the following response, so I’ve transcribed a portion of it below.
 ~In Uzumasa, Kyoto, folklore and records preserved in classical texts and the founding legends of shrines describe both conflicts and harmony in the relationship between the naturalized immigrants (the Hata clan) and the local population. I’m looking for specific anecdotes about how the Hata clan—a group of technical experts who arrived later—interacted with the people who were already there. …~
 I’d like to explore this topic further in the future, but I’ll save that for another post.
I’m scheduled to return to Sapporo today amid heavy rain. I wonder if I’ll be able to land safely…

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

【渋谷「東急東横線」入口写真、10人中外人が4人か?】


 さてほぼ半年ぶりの東京ですが、あちこち歩きまわっていると外人の姿が圧倒的に多い。円安ということで日本への渡航、長期間滞在などのコストがたぶん相当下がって来て、いまやジャパンセールスみたいな状況なのでしょうね。しかしちょっとした飲食店などでも海外の人材が目立っているので、東京の「現在人口」割合では、非常に多国籍化してきているのでしょう。
 写真はたまたま通りかかって、どこにも発見できなかった「渋谷・東急東横線」出入り口をようやく探し当てられたので写真に収めたものですが、私の印象では、海外からの旅行者や海外にルーツを持つように見受けられる人が以前よりずっと多く感じられた。外見だけの判断なので参考までですが、まぁ常態的にこれくらいの割合になっているようです。
 日本社会の少子高齢化、それと市場経済規模の維持拡大という「資本の論理」との合間で、このような状況が日本社会で露わになってきているのでしょうね。そのことが「底流」となっての政治経済社会の全状況が、現代ニッポンなのでしょう。ただし人口構成の変化そのものを善悪で語るのではなく、それを前提に社会制度や地域のあり方をどう設計していくかが、これからの課題なのでしょう。
 昨日渋谷区広尾の広域開発現場写真をアップしたら「それに引き換え、札幌すら含めた他の北海道などの地域の過疎地化ぶりは・・・」という意見が友人から寄せられていた。わたしとしては、札幌市民としてそこまでの感覚はなかったのですが、とくに北海道内の人口減少ぶりは先端的に進んでいることは事実。
 高齢化してきて自分自身のいのちとの対話がメインにはなってきますが、やはり孫子のことも合わせて考えれば、冷静に見て行かなければなりませんね。日本人の割合は日本社会全体では5-6割程度にまで下がっていく未来は、さてどのようなことが想定できるのか、沈思させられる。ほかの要因は変動するけれど、人口の要因はほぼ確実に未来に現出する事態。
 日本史では弥生期から仏教伝来期など大量の移住が繰り返されてきた。京都に残る太秦など、地名にもその痕跡が残っているけれど、その時代以上の「民族的ブレンディング」が起こっていく可能性が高い。そのことが底流要因になっていろいろな社会変容も起こっていったのでしょう。
 歴史に学びながら、行く末をデザインしていく必要があるのでしょうね。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Photo of the Shibuya “Tokyu Toyoko Line” entrance—are 4 out of 10 people foreigners?]
The conflict between Japan’s declining population and the need to maintain and develop its economy = the trend toward a multi-ethnic society. However, Japanese history also offers lessons from past experiences. We must learn from them. …

 Well, it’s been almost half a year since I was last in Tokyo, and as I’ve been walking around, I’ve noticed an overwhelming number of foreigners. With the weak yen, the cost of traveling to Japan and staying for extended periods has likely dropped significantly, so it’s probably like a “Japan Sale” right now. However, foreign workers are noticeable even in small restaurants and the like, so in terms of Tokyo’s “current population,” it’s likely becoming increasingly multicultural.
 The photo shows the “Shibuya Tokyu Toyoko Line” entrance that I finally managed to find after walking by several times without spotting it—I took the picture just because I happened to come across it. My impression is that there seem to be far more travelers from overseas and people who appear to have foreign roots than before. This is just based on appearances, so take it with a grain of salt, but it seems this proportion has become the norm.
 This situation is likely becoming increasingly apparent in Japanese society as it navigates the tension between its declining birthrate and aging population, on one hand, and the “logic of capital”—which demands maintaining and expanding the scale of the market economy—on the other. Modern Japan is defined by the overall political, economic, and social landscape shaped by this underlying current. However, rather than judging the demographic shift itself as good or bad, the challenge moving forward is how to design social systems and regional structures based on this new reality.
 Yesterday, when I posted photos of a large-scale development site in Hiroo, Shibuya Ward, a friend commented, “In contrast, look at the depopulation in other regions of Hokkaido, including even Sapporo…” As a resident of Sapporo, I hadn’t really felt that strongly about it, but it is true that population decline is progressing particularly rapidly within Hokkaido.
 As I grow older, my focus naturally shifts to reflecting on my own life, but when I also consider my grandchildren, I realize I must continue to observe these developments with a clear head. It gives me pause to contemplate what the future might hold as the proportion of Japanese people in Japanese society as a whole drops to around 50–60 percent. While other factors may fluctuate, the demographic shift is a reality that will almost certainly manifest in the future.
 Throughout Japanese history, from the Yayoi period to the introduction of Buddhism, large-scale migrations have occurred repeatedly. Traces of this can still be found in place names, such as Uzumasa in Kyoto, but it is highly likely that an even greater degree of “ethnic blending” than in those eras will occur. This likely served as an underlying factor that drove various social transformations.
We must design our future while learning from history.

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.
 

【AI利用の家系史探究&東京渋谷で広域開発現場発見】




 さて昨日、所用があって東京へ移動。東京の「広尾」地区を訪れる用件を終了後、歩いていたら目前に「広尾中学校複合施設(仮称)」という工事現場を通りかかっていた。
 建設会社は東急建設で、設計者名には「山下設計・藤本壮介設計共同体」ということ。工事の状況は2枚目の写真の通りですが、そこそこの広さがあるので、大型の建築が想定されるところ。広尾中学校という公共施設の建て替えだけでこういった有名設計事務所が関わることはないでしょうから、その公共用地と施設を核にしながら、ひとつの「タウン機能」を満たすような建築が想定されていると推察。
 まぁ、わたしは住宅オンリーのフィールドで生きてきた人間なので、大型のタウン造成工事などについての情報は門外漢ですが、ちょっとした「地縁」でもあるので、興味を持たされた。というか、こりゃぁ広尾が大きく再開発されて、渋谷地域の変貌がさらに巨大化するのでしょうね。
 この広尾から最寄りの恵比寿駅ではなく渋谷駅方向に下りて行ったのですが、そこから都心の宿泊地まで移動する地下鉄渋谷駅まで、学生時代からサラリーマン時代までの8年間ほど親しんでいた「渋谷」とはまったく思えないほどの地域変貌ぶり。とくにここ数年の変容ぶりにはほとんど迷子状態(笑)。どうも地域再開発のグランドデザインがまったく見られない。混沌がそのまま表出の大都会ぶり。
 ・・・というところですが、そういう道すがらでも昨日お伝えした、従兄弟同士での「家系史研究」対談をデータ化して、それを使ってまとめていくためのAIとのやり取りは同時並行。
 やはりこの時期の東京の温熱感はスゴいのでホテルに入ったら即爆睡後、やおら起き出してのやり取り。やはり「プロンプト」の書き方が決定的に重要ですね。簡単に「ハルシネーション」に落ち込ませずに、働かせるには「情報管理力」みたいなものが決定的なのだなぁと痛感させられる。
 しかしわたしなどの世代は、そもそもIT化の最先端変容の第1世代という経験知を経た存在である上に、いまはAI変容をも第1世代として受け止める存在。そういうなかでの「高齢化」なので、世代としての共通興味ゾーン「この世あの世」を強く意識する世代として、家系の情報の「デジタル的変化」にも取り組んでいかなければならない宿命。ふ〜む、これもこの時代を生きる者の因果応報なのかなぁ?

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Exploring Family History with AI & Discovering a Large-Scale Development Site in Shibuya, Tokyo]
Walking through a rapidly changing metropolis while using AI to organize our family history. A construction site in Hiroo and a late-night conversation about family history at a hotel. Reimagining both the city and our memories…

 Well, yesterday I traveled to Tokyo on some business. After wrapping up my business in Tokyo’s “Hiroo” district, I was walking around when I happened to pass by a construction site labeled “Hiroo Junior High School Complex (tentative name).”
 The construction company is Tokyu Construction, and the design firm is listed as the “Yamashita Sekkei and Sou Fujimoto Design Consortium.” As shown in the second photo, the site is quite spacious, so it’s likely intended for a large-scale building. It’s unlikely that such renowned architectural firms would be involved just for the reconstruction of a public facility like Hiroo Junior High School, so I surmise that the plan is for a building that serves as a “town hub,” with the public land and facility at its core.
Well, since I’ve spent my entire career in the residential sector, I’m a complete outsider when it comes to large-scale urban development projects, but because I have a slight “local connection” to the area, it piqued my interest. Or rather, this probably means Hiroo is undergoing major redevelopment, which will further accelerate the transformation of the Shibuya area.
 From Hiroo, I headed down toward Shibuya Station rather than the nearest Ebisu Station, and the area’s transformation was so drastic that it was completely unrecognizable as the “Shibuya” I’d been familiar with for about eight years—from my student days through my time as a salaryman—all the way to Shibuya Subway Station, where I’d transfer to reach my downtown lodging. The changes over the past few years in particular have left me practically lost (laughs). It really feels like there’s no overarching master plan for the area’s redevelopment at all. It’s just a big city where chaos is on full display.
 …Anyway, even while walking along those streets, I was simultaneously working on digitizing the “family history research” conversation between my cousins that I mentioned yesterday, and using that data to compile my notes through interactions with AI.
 As expected, the heat in Tokyo at this time of year is intense, so as soon as I got to the hotel, I fell into a deep sleep, then woke up slowly to continue the work. It really drives home how critically important the way you write “prompts” is. I’m keenly aware that “information management skills”—or something like that—are essential for keeping the AI working effectively without letting it slip into “hallucinations” too easily.
 However, people of my generation have not only experienced the first wave of cutting-edge IT transformation firsthand but are now also the first generation to embrace the transformation brought by AI. Given that we’re “aging” in this context—as a generation strongly conscious of our shared interest in “this world and the next”—we’re destined to tackle the “digital transformation” of our family history. Hmm, I wonder if this is just karma for those of us living in this era?

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

【最新i-OSとMacで4時間超の家系史対談を文書まとめへ】


 昨日は家系の従兄弟と次兄との3人で「わが家系史」探索の対談をしておりました。
 従兄弟は父の兄の子で、わたしと次兄は父の子。家系史を探るのにも、こういう「立場」の違いによる認識の相違が発生してくる。そしてそれぞれ独自に家系探査してきているので、こうした情報交換によって、格差・相違を埋め合わせたいと思ったのです。
 事実、わたしよりも12歳年長の従兄弟はその「母系」が醸成する地域社会からの情報が非常に大きい興味領域を占めていることが話していて伝わってきた。わたしたち兄弟はそういう社会とは距離を持って生きた父の生き方に沿って見てきていたので、それは非常に新鮮だった。要するに父を超えて祖父の生き様の実相、異なる見方が伝わってきた次第。父の代の兄弟でもものごとのとらえ方、祖父の事跡への解釈の仕方が「枝分かれ」していることが、実感された次第。
 そういうことなので、興味を持っている地域性・地域社会の擦り合わせがアタマのなかで高速で「仕分け・理解」しながらの対談内容。正直、従兄弟の発する地名・人名の名詞自体に対しての仕分けがまったく追いつかないのですね。
 また同時に当方からの探究の疑問点は、従兄弟も「初めて聞いた」みたいな反応が大きかったりした。・・・そういうことでなかなかに「スリリング」な展開(笑)。
 で、親戚らしく従兄弟の家に着いたらすぐに対談が始まったので、iPhoneの「ボイスメモ」を起動させたのも開始から30分程度経過後。そこから4時間超の対談記録を録音。
 さすがに昨日は疲れたので帰宅後バタンキュー。本日早朝に「整理整頓」作業に取り組んで、ボイスメモからの「文字起こし」を行った。iOSの進化ぶりはAI活用を受けて隔世の感。4時間超の対談記録があっという間に65,000字程度にテキスト化できた。
 そこからの対談内容の整理整頓(だれがしゃべった内容かの仕分けと地名・人名の「系統付け」など)もAIを活用することで、道筋がハッキリしてきた。
 いまはAIに整理作業させているところですが、AIからはやや「忖度」気味に「地域史・家族史の一次資料として十分」というような返答が帰ってきている。こういう対談についての、AI活用のひとつのテストケースにもと考えています。
 AIによる架空の事実を正しいかのように自信満々に出力してしまう現象〜ハルシネーションに気を付けて進行させたいと思います。さて・・・。

<写真は熊本県の国宝「通潤橋」の放水シーン>

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Compiling a 4-Hour-Plus Family History Discussion on the Latest iOS and Mac into a Document]
Even among close cousins, there are differences in perspective regarding family history. Aligning our respective areas of interest. Promoting mutual understanding and integrating our perspectives. …

 Yesterday, the three of us—my cousin on my father’s side, my second oldest brother, and I—had a conversation exploring “our family history.”
My cousin is the son of my father’s older brother, while my second oldest brother and I are my father’s sons. Even when researching family history, differences in perspective arise due to these differing “positions.” Since each of us has been conducting our own family history research, I wanted to bridge the gaps and differences through this exchange of information.
 In fact, as we talked, it became clear that my cousin—who is 12 years older than me—is deeply interested in information derived from the local community shaped by his “maternal lineage.” Since my brother and I had viewed things through the lens of our father’s lifestyle—which kept him at a distance from that kind of community—this perspective was very refreshing. In short, I gained a different perspective on the true nature of my grandfather’s life, one that went beyond my father’s view. I truly came to realize that even among my father’s siblings, their ways of perceiving things and interpreting my grandfather’s deeds had “branched off” in different directions.
 Because of this, our conversation unfolded as I rapidly “sorted and understood” the regional characteristics and local communities I was interested in, all while the discussion was taking place. To be honest, I simply couldn’t keep up with sorting through all the place names and people’s names my cousin was mentioning.
 At the same time, when I asked probing questions, my cousin often reacted as if he were hearing the answers for the first time. …So, it turned out to be quite a “thrilling” exchange (laughs).
 As is typical among relatives, the conversation started the moment we arrived at my cousin’s house, so I didn’t launch the “Voice Memos” app on my iPhone until about 30 minutes into the conversation. From there, I recorded over four hours of our conversation.
 I was understandably exhausted yesterday, so I crashed as soon as I got home. Early this morning, I got to work “organizing” the recording and transcribed the Voice Memos. Thanks to AI, iOS has evolved so much that it feels like a world of difference. The over four-hour conversation was transcribed into about 65,000 characters in the blink of an eye.
 By using AI to organize the content of the conversation—such as sorting who said what and categorizing place names and people’s names—the structure has become much clearer.
I’m currently having the AI handle the organization, and it’s responding with a slightly “overly accommodating” tone, suggesting that the recording is “sufficient as primary source material for local and family history.” I view this as a test case for using AI with this type of conversation.
 I want to proceed while being careful to avoid the phenomenon where AI confidently outputs fictional facts as if they were true—a phenomenon known as “hallucination.” Well then…

● Announcement
My book, “Writers and Living Spaces,” has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.

【1588年滅亡の筑後「草野氏」史を伝承する地域性】




 九州福岡県の久留米の家と縁づいたことで、その地を巡った旅路。歴史・地理の社会科系が大好きな性格ですので、それを機会に仕事の一線から離れたこともあって、九州全県巡りをしました。
 で、その肝心の久留米をあちこち回って訪れてみたのが、この「草野歴史資料館」。
 住所名に「久留米市草野町」といまもその氏族名が残っているわけですが、学ばせていただいたところ、この氏族は1164年にこの地域に根付いて、豊臣秀吉の九州攻めに際して1588年に敗亡している。この地に深く関係したのが425年間で、滅亡してから438年経過している地域豪族。
 北海道人的な感覚からすると、まことにはるかなる世界。
 そういう歴史的存在に対してこの地域としては「歴史資料館」を建設してその情報を「鎮護」している。そのことがちょっと実感を持てない。やはり九州、その人間活動の歴史蓄積に驚く。
 この中世豪族・草野氏の要約は以下。
 〜筑後草野氏は、1164(長寛2)年に肥前高木より筑後吉木に入国してから始まる。源平争乱(1180-1190年)に際してはいち早く筑後平野を見晴らす高良山で兵を挙げ「竹野合戦」で平家軍を破ってから各地を転戦し源氏方の勝利に貢献した。その功により1186(文治2)年、源頼朝の推挙により筑後国在国司・押領使職に補任されて以来、当国に確固たる地位を獲得し。
 文永弘安の役(1274~82)に際して、草野永綱・経永父子は、神代良忠や西牟田弥次郎ら筑後の諸士とともに果敢に戦い侵攻した蒙古軍を撃退した。また南北朝期には南朝の征西将軍・宮良親王、菊池武光の下で活躍し、1361(正平16)年九州征西府の掛立に貢献。
 室町~戦国時代にあっては九州の覇権をめぐる豊後の大友、肥前の龍造寺、薩摩の島津らによる争いに翻弄されながら一族の存亡をかけて戦ったが、豊臣秀吉による九州国割後の1585(天正16)年、肥後南関において、肥後一揆鎖圧軍蜂須賀家政によって誘殺され、約425年間の歴史を閉じた。〜
 ・・・阿倍比羅夫の遠征や奥州藤原氏の北方交易などの断片的な歴史事跡しか持っていない北海道人としては、こういう時代の事実関係の資料などが積層していることに、さらにそれも滅亡した氏族の痕跡が残り続けていることに驚嘆。ワクワクさせられる北の旅人。
 日本史の奥行き、民族史の深さに朦朧としながら、鮮烈さに目が覚める思いであります。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Regional Traditions Preserving the History of the Chikugo “Kusano Clan,” Which Fell in 1588]
I was just casually looking around, but I was overwhelmed by the fact that this region still preserves such a wealth of historical records about a medieval powerful clan that fell 438 years ago. …

 A journey through the region of Kurume in Fukuoka Prefecture, Kyushu, sparked by my connection to a family there. Since I’ve always loved social studies—especially history and geography—I took this opportunity to step away from the front lines of my work and tour every prefecture in Kyushu.
So, after exploring various parts of Kurume itself, I visited this “Kusano Historical Museum.”
 The address “Kusano-cho, Kurume City” still bears the name of this clan, and from what I learned, this clan took root in the area in 1164 but was defeated and wiped out in 1588 during Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s campaign to conquer Kyushu. They were a regional clan deeply connected to this land for 425 years, and 438 years have passed since their demise.
 From a Hokkaido resident’s perspective, this feels like a truly distant world.
 In response to such a historical presence, the region has built a “History Museum” to “preserve” this information. I find it a bit hard to truly grasp the significance of that. As expected of Kyushu—I’m amazed by the accumulated history of human activity here.
 Here is a summary of the Kusano clan, a medieval regional clan:
 ~ The history of the Chikugo Kusano clan began in 1164 (Chōkan 2) when they entered Chikugo Yoshiki from Hizen Takagi. During the Genpei War (1180–1190), they were among the first to raise an army on Mount Kōra, which overlooks the Chikugo Plain. After defeating the Taira forces at the Battle of Takeno, they fought in various locations and contributed to the Minamoto clan’s victory. In recognition of these achievements, in 1186 (Bunji 2), upon the recommendation of Minamoto no Yoritomo, he was appointed Governor and Military Commissioner of Chikugo Province, thereby securing a firm position in the province.
 During the Bun’ei–Kōan Campaigns (1274–82), the Kusano father-and-son duo, Nagatsuna and Tsunehisa, fought valiantly alongside Chikugo warriors such as Kamidai Yoshitada and Nishimuta Yajirō to repel the invading Mongol forces. Furthermore, during the Nanboku-chō period, they played an active role under Prince Miyara, the Seishi Shōgun of the Southern Court, and Kikuchi Takemitsu, contributing to the establishment of the Kyushu Seishi-fu in 1361 (Shōhei 16).
During the Muromachi and Sengoku periods, while caught in the turmoil of conflicts over hegemony in Kyushu—including the Ōtomo clan of Bungo, the Ryūzōji clan of Hizen, and the Shimazu of Satsuma over hegemony in Kyushu. He fought for the survival of his clan, but in 1585 (Tenshō 16), following Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s redistribution of Kyushu, he was lured and killed at Nankan in Higo by Hachisuka Iemasa, a commander of the forces suppressing the Higo Uprising, bringing an end to a history spanning approximately 425 years. ~
 …As a Hokkaido native who is familiar only with fragmentary historical events—such as Abe no Hirafu’s expedition and the northern trade of the Oshu Fujiwara clan—I am amazed by the wealth of historical records documenting the facts of this era, and even more so by the enduring traces left behind by this extinct clan. It’s thrilling for a traveler in the North.
While I am somewhat dazed by the depth of Japanese history and the richness of ethnic history, I am also awakened by its vivid intensity.

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.
 

【松本清張の住空間の無念から小倉城庭園で癒される】



 わたしは司馬遼太郎という多作な作家の著作群に耽溺していた人間で、ほぼ同時代的な活躍時期だった松本清張さんについては、あまり強い興味を持っていませんでした。しかし「点と線」などの作品のひきこまれるような創作法の素晴らしさについては、強い印象を持っています。
 だからこそ、その住空間との「対話ぶり」を実体感したかったと言えるでしょう。
 これまで多くの作家の息づかいの残る住空間を体験してきて、そこからその人間について、いわば「会ってきた」印象が加わって、自分の中でその作家に対してのイメージが再構築される、そういう心象部分に数寄を感じているのですね。
 今回の機会は九州全周12日間の夫婦の旅路でのこと。スケジュール的な問題もあったので、制約のある参観条件からは、やむなしと納めざるを得なかったということ。いまは、各種資料を見返しながら「追体験」型の参観を継続してきています。図録資料をくくりながら思い返してきている。やはり作家と読者との「対話感」は継続できている。
 松本清張さんの仕事部屋、住空間についての写真は複数点、記念館の図録には紹介されていた。ただし、その図録も引用制限されている。これもまぁやむなし、でありますが・・・。
 ということで、建築的な取材は現地では断念したワケですが、今後書斎とMac環境で可能な限りリベンジして行きたい(笑)と考えております。
 そういう無念をすこし癒やしてくれたのが、写真の小倉城庭園のみごとな建築。
 日本人の住宅建築の数寄のなかで庭園は大きな意識の領域を占めているのでしょう。とくにながく人の暮らし・人跡が積層している本州以南地域では、人為的に操作された自然環境鑑賞「技法」が、大名庭園というカタチで遺されてきている。対して、ちょっと街を歩いただけでも太古以来の蝦夷地の自然環境が迫ってくる北海道人には、こういう「箱庭」感は同意しにくい。ですが、松本清張さんの住宅参観での残念無念感からは「それは悲しかったね、よかったらこういう大名庭園の良さも感じて」みたいな呼び声を感じた(笑)。
 全国のこういった庭園美には、ふーむ、とエトランゼ感いっぱいで「見るだけ」だったのですが、こういう経緯を経てくると、少しだけ癒やされる部分がありました。言ってみれば人為的な都合に遮られた「見る権利・視覚体験」が慰められた、といったところ。ややこころに平安。

●お知らせ
拙書「作家と住空間」幻冬舎から電子書籍で発刊
お求めはAmazonで。
https://amzn.asia/d/eUiv9yO

English version⬇

[Finding Solace in the Ogura Castle Gardens After Feeling a Sense of Regret About Seicho Matsumoto’s Living Spaces]
A sense of regret regarding the author and his living spaces. The scenery of the daimyo garden right next door seemed to comfort me, as if to say, “Even though it’s just a miniature garden like this, let your heart rest a little.” …

 I was someone who was completely absorbed in the works of the prolific author Ryotaro Shiba, and I didn’t have much interest in Seicho Matsumoto, who was active during roughly the same era. However, I was deeply impressed by the brilliance of his captivating writing style, as seen in works such as *Points and Lines*.
That is precisely why I wanted to experience firsthand the “dialogue” between him and his living space.
 Having experienced the living spaces of many writers where their very breath still lingers, I find a certain “suki” in that emotional aspect—where the impression of having, so to speak, “met” the person adds to my understanding, leading me to reconstruct my image of the writer within myself.
 This opportunity arose during a 12-day trip my wife and I took around Kyushu. Due to scheduling issues, we had to accept the limited viewing conditions as unavoidable. Now, I’m continuing a sort of “re-experience” of the visit by reviewing various materials. I’ve been reflecting on it while going through the exhibition catalog. Indeed, that sense of “dialogue” between the author and the reader continues.
 The museum catalog featured several photographs of Seicho Matsumoto’s study and living spaces. However, even that catalog is subject to citation restrictions. Well, I suppose that’s unavoidable, but…
So, while I had to give up on architectural research on-site, I’m thinking of making up for it as much as possible in the future from my study and on my Mac (laughs).
 What helped soothe that sense of regret, at least a little, was the magnificent architecture of the Kokura Castle Gardens captured in the photos.
 Within the Japanese aesthetic sensibility of residential architecture, gardens likely occupy a significant place in people’s consciousness. Especially in regions south of Honshu, where human life and traces of human activity have accumulated over a long history, “techniques” for appreciating artificially manipulated natural environments have been preserved in the form of daimyo gardens. In contrast, for us Hokkaido residents—who feel the natural environment of Ezo, dating back to ancient times, closing in on us even with just a brief stroll through town—it’s hard to relate to this “miniature garden” aesthetic. However, from the sense of regret and disappointment I felt during my tour of Seicho Matsumoto’s home, I sensed a voice calling out to me, saying, “That must have been sad. If you’d like, why not try to appreciate the beauty of these daimyo gardens too?” (lol).
 When it came to the beauty of such gardens across the country, I used to just “look” at them with a sense of being an outsider, thinking, “Hmm…” But having gone through this experience, I found a small measure of solace. You could say that my “right to see” and “visual experience”—which had been obstructed by human convenience—were finally consoled. I felt a slight sense of peace.

● Announcement
My book, *Writers and Living Spaces*, has been published as an e-book by Gentosha.
Available on Amazon.